ECO-FANATICS – Why do they hate us?

Ever heard the phrase, “If you repeat a lie often enough, it will be believed”?

Of course this doesn’t mean that a lie actually becomes the “truth”, but rather that the lie is believed to be “true” by brainwashed people who then turn it into an operational component of their worldview.  When there are enough delusional people believing the same lie, a tipping point is reached that can transform (or destroy) an entire society.

Those living in relatively free western democracies have largely convinced themselves that they are somehow immune from the ravages of propaganda, yet these same folks have spent a lifetime being manipulated by commercial television or a broken down educational system, in other words- believing lies.  For too many of our fellow citizens, the fact that deception is rampant among western cultures is a difficult concept to grasp, perhaps impossible.   But those with eyes to see will appreciate the fact that this statement perfectly describes the tactics we see employed by a cadre of pretentious wolf “experts” and arm-chair environmentalists who walk in lock step promoting their own warped version of reality.

This little rant of mine will attempt to explain why these folks hate people who think differently from themselves.  It may also explain why these people continue to promote the patently unscientific theory that a voracious predator such as the Gray Wolf causes beneficial ripple effects on a given habitat.  It will explain why only “good” outcomes of wolf re-colonization are emphasized while “bad” outcomes are completely ignored or redefined.  Wolf proponents constantly feed us “facts” about how the “beneficial” effects of wolves  are “trophically cascading” down through the ecosystem.  Yes, wolves do have a major impact on the ecosystem, but making value judgments about “good” or “bad” depend solely on one’s concept of reality.

We have to remember that the pro-wolf lobby is a community of like-minded individuals who have repeated their own lies so many times that they can no longer distinguish the truth. In fact, they no longer care about the truth.  All they care about is winning the argument and imposing their views on the rest of society.  These folks go round and round in circles quoting each other as if doing so provides evidence that their beliefs are true, when in fact all they are doing is providing proof of conformity. This illusion of unanimity provides them with the needed emotional support on which to base their false opinions.

This closed-minded community of self-deluded folks hang their hat on how many people they can fool into joining their cause.  These folks excel at intimidating the opposition, a tactic meant to bolster themselves by capturing the adulation of their minions.  Any lie is permitted, as long as everyone faithfully believes and continually repeats the same lie.  Attacking “non-believers”, influence peddling, crafting policies and/or passing legislation that promotes their worldview provides them with all the proof they need of the “rightness” of their positions.

Now of course, everything I just said can be turned around by the eco-fanatics and applied as a weapon against those who oppose their warped worldview.  They can say the exact same things about us, regardless of the lack of evidence to support their accusations.  True, some of us react in anger and say things we shouldn’t when we are confronted by the lies of the enemy. This is why it is critical that we stick to the facts, stick to reality, and try to remain the adults in the room. We also have to understand that arguing with eco-fanatics is a futile endeavor because common sense reasoning and scientific evidence simply doesn’t matter to them.  Many of them are simply too fearful of hearing the truth because doing so would undermine the shaky foundation their entire lives have been built upon.

In 1899, Gustave Le Bon provided keen insight into the role of propaganda on society.  In The Crowd:  A Study of the Popular Mind (c. 1899), Le Bon explained how masses of people could be manipulated by forming a consensus of opinion. Le Bon proved that it simply did not matter if the opinion be true or false as long as people believed it.  Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin all built a collectivist mindset among millions of followers by using Le Bon’s methods.

Many of us are alarmed that America appears to be edging towards the brink of self-destruction. We are angered that America’s demise is being helped along by the pseudo-scientific elitism of the radical environmentalists.  We would do well to understand what Le Bon wrote over 200 years ago.  Lies about global warming, fascist claims about the benefits of wolves, or the pressing need for global governance by an elite cadre of “superior” human beings, are no different than the lies told by the NAZI’s concerning Aryan racial superiority.  To Hitler, “trophic cascade” made perfect sense and he intended to use it to dominate the world.

Here’s a few excerpts from Le Bon’s masterpiece on mass manipulation and collectivist thinking:

“Communal reinforcement is a social phenomenon in which a concept or idea is repeatedly asserted in a community, regardless of whether sufficient empirical evidence has been presented to support it. Over time, the concept or idea is reinforced to become a strong belief in many people’s minds, and may be regarded by the members of the community as fact.”

“The phrase ‘millions of people can’t all be wrong’ is indicative of the common tendency to accept a communally reinforced idea without question….”

“Affirmation pure and simple, kept free of all reasoning and all proof, is one of the surest means of making an idea enter the mind of crowds. The conciser an affirmation is, the more destitute of every appearance of proof and demonstration, the more weight it carries…. Statesmen called upon to defend a political cause, and commercial men pushing the sale of their products by means of advertising are acquainted with the value of affirmation.  Affirmation, however, has no real influence unless it be constantly repeated, and so far as possible in the same terms.”

“The influence of repetition on crowds…  This power is due to the fact that the repeated statement is embedded in the long run in those profound regions of our unconscious selves in which the motives of our actions are forged. At the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.”

“When an affirmation has been sufficiently repeated and there is unanimity in this repetition — as has occurred in the case of certain famous financial undertakings rich enough to purchase every assistance — what is called a current of opinion is formed and the powerful mechanism of contagion intervenes. Ideas, sentiments, emotions, and beliefs possess in crowds a contagious power as intense as that of microbes.” (Page 127)

Speaking of microbes, let’s take a look at one of the myths being promoted by the pro-wolf lobby. The life cycle of Echinococcus granulosus (hydatid disease) is well documented in the literature, including methods of transmission from one animal to another.   It is a scientifically verifiable fact that wolves are spreading billions of parasitic eggs in their feces as they re-colonize large portions of our western landscapes.    Eminent biologists from around the world who are intimately acquainted with the life cycle of wolves and ungulates have warned us that parasitic tapeworm (E.g.) disease poses a serious risk to our wild game herds, other canids, livestock, and humans.

Yet what does the “pro-wolf” lobby do?  They lobby against legislation such as H.B. 1107 that would have expanded our knowledge of the risk of this and other wolf borne diseases on the grounds that it would have led to “less tolerance for wolf re-introduction.”   Not only that, but the eco-fanatics then go out of their way to promote the idea that fear of hydatid disease is overblown and that echinococcus granulosus eggs deposited in wolf scat poses little or no risk to humans.  They point out that some “veterinarian” did a study which determined that e. granulosus eggs do not survive heat, desiccation (extreme drying), or harsh chemical applications.

So lets see, wolf scat deposited on forested land in Idaho in late November is subjected to intense heat, extreme desiccation, and/or harsh chemicals when?   How about in December after the first snow fall? Would wolf scat be safe to kick around then?  Not much heat during the winter is there?  How about extreme dryness?  Exactly how long does it take for these highly contaminated scat piles to dry out?  Will it dry out faster buried in the snow or on top of the snow?  Will it dry out in April as the snow melts and the new wolf pups come out to play?  No?  How about in July?  Yes, perhaps there’s a two or three week window where wolf scat could conceivably dry out sufficiently enough to kill the hydatid eggs, but again, maybe not.  Maybe we just need to rely on a series of pro-longed droughts and/or catastrophic forest fires.  We simply can’t have summer thunderstorms re-hydrating contaminated wolf scat now can we?  Oh, but surely wolf scat will dry out after a year or two of exposure to the elements, won’t it?   And of course all the while more and more fresh wolf scat is being deposited spreading the contamination across millions of acres.  But not to worry, say the wolf lovers, there is little risk of infection.

The wolf advocates have taken a page right out of Le Bon, as did Adolf Hitler:

“But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and most important requirement for success.”   Adolf Hitler – Mein Kempf

According to the wolf advocates, an eminently qualified expert such as Val Geist is a liar, and anyone concerned about the spread of hydatid disease is engaged in fear mongering.  Ironically, or perhaps typically, the pro-wolf lobby has conveniently promoted incomplete and inaccurate information that if analyzed in greater detail actually supports what their nemesis, Professor Geist, has determined to be true, which is that once wolves are removed from the landscape we may have to intentionally burn millions of acres in order to effectively destroy hydatid eggs.

But facts don’t stop the pro-wolf lobby from trying to pull the wolf skin over the eyes of the public.  The reason these people hate us so much is because we point out the fictions upon which their theoretical house of cards is built.  We do this because God has given us the ability, the moral conscience, and the understanding to realize that even if you repeat a lie often enough….it is still a lie.

Sources and additional reading:

Gustave Le Bon- In The Crowd:  A Study of the Popular Mind (c. 1899), as quoted from an article entitled “Group Thinking and Collective Behavior” http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwashing/crowd.htm

Dr. Valerius Geist – Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science, Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary.  Dr. Geist is a specialist on the biology, behavior, and social dynamics of large North American mammals.

http://westinstenv.org/wildpeop/2010/02/07/synopsis-of-wolf-borne-hydatid-disease/

http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/2011/05/24/dr-valerius-geist-address-boone-crockett-on-hydatid-disease/

http://rliv.com/wolf/OutdoorsmanJan2010.pdf

http://graywolfnews.com/pdf/Outdoorsman_No_44_June_2011.pdf

15 thoughts on “ECO-FANATICS – Why do they hate us?

  1. Scott Rockholm

    I thank you for another perfectly executed writing. I have been on the offensive to expose this very topic for many years now, and this is one of the best descriptive writings on the topic.

    With regard to the Echinococcus granulosus, and the eco fanatics (Wolf cult) refusal to adhere to the strict laws surrounding infectious diseased imported by wolves, and the cult like refusal to recognize the ecological disaster brought to us by wolf “Introduction”, their actions border criminal.

    I hold nearly all documents, both Federal and State, that explain, in detail, the criminal enterprise known as wolf introduction. Beginning with the permits required to import any animal into the U.S., which in this case would be wolves from Northern Canada, form 3-177 was not issued as required by law. Only a border inspection permit was issued by the USFWS. How did Ed Bangs side step Federal law, in clear violation of Congress? Ed Bangs utilized a permit issued by Idaho, more specifically, Jerry Conley of Idaho Fish and Game. Conley and Bangs colluded (Conspired) through a series of emails and correspondence, to bypass the legal means to introduce wolves from Canada. Conley issued the permit, violating the Idaho Legislatures written censure of his participation in wolf introduction. I have copies of all of these transactions, and copies of the signed illegal permit. (This is only a fraction of evidence I posses).

    With regard to the many diseases wolves carry, but more specifically e.g. (Hydatid Disease), the Canadian Veterinarian did not check or treat any wolf captured for introduction purposes, even though Idaho sent their own Veterinarian to observe the process. From the time of capture to the time wolves were transported into the United States, no treatment or required quarantine took place. The Vet. records we obtained from the USFWS clearly show, in all 108 pages of Canadian documents, that the only treatment the wolves received was one rabies shot.

    All of this information will soon hit the desks of many legislators and the states Attorney General. Crimes occurred to facilitate wolf introduction, and the Federal and State agencies lied. The eco fanatics, such as Defenders of Wildlife, have spent a great deal of effort to cover for the illegality of this wolf introduction and disease transport into the United States.

  2. jfk2010

    Another great article Steve!! And great comments from Scott.

    I have a story about the wolves in Arizona/New Mexico too. The wildlife biologist that captured the first three wolves, in Mexico, that would become the seedstock for Services’ captive breeding program, Roy McBride, sent comments to the Service saying they shouldn’t allow hybrid wolf/dogs into their program. They did this when they included a pack of hybrid wolf/dogs from the Ghost Ranch in New Mexico.

    The Service’s wildlife biologist, Dave Parson, knew they were hybrids but figured out a way around the truth. He mustered a group of “scientists” together to certify the wolves were genuine wolves. The truth was once again stuck in the mud and the Service proceeded on down the road with all their lies and deception.

    Parson works for the Rewilding Institute today and hob nobs with folks from the Defenders of Wildlife, Wildlands Project, Sky Island Alliance, Center for Biological Diversity, et.al…! http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Parsons_David_12425455.aspx

    So the lies continue!! Heaped on by a media that just loves to broadcasting thier lies to the ignorant folks too busy trying to make a living to give a hoot… sad story!!

  3. Scott, do you have any documentation showing the safe handling procedures for state or federal employees when they are handling/collaring wolves? I would like to contrast that info with the lack of info being provided to hunters and trappers.

  4. Steve W.

    Look for “The Westerner” … February 24th issue that will come out late tonight early, early in the morning … pay particular attention to the statistics.

  5. Scott Rockholm

    To the best of my knowledge, no documentation existed as a means to inform the Services employees of the safe handling of Canids. It took me three years of extensive pressure to force Idaho Fish and Game to issue a warning to hunters. I went as far as asking them to publish warnings to the general public, and those who were susceptible, due to their outdoor activities. I argued, Idaho should have ownership of the public dangers, as they were the entity that violated the public trust. Only one small paragraph exists in the hunting regulations of Idaho. Carter (The Wolfer) Neimeyer claims to have been tested for e.g. by means of a simple blood test, but we know he was lied to or he himself is stretching the truth.

  6. Ruth

    Thanks for another excellent article Steve. I also appreciate the additional information provided by your readers in their comments.

  7. Thanks Scott. I want to see some recent pics of IDFG or WDFW handling wolves. Gloves? No gloves? I wonder. Anyhow, I updated the CDC image I used to show the complete life cycle. I have seen this same diagram photo-shopped with an image of a wolf and an elk in the place of the generic “canid” and the sheep. It should be included in the hunting and trapping regs.

  8. It’s coming down to a choice…..”Do you want to commit a felony, or do you want to protect your livestock”. Rep. Joel Kretz describes the political reality facing ranchers in Washington State.

    [audio src="http://stevenscountycattlemen.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/capitolreport-kretz-022713.mp3" /]

  9. James

    I will explain the benefits of wolfs in the ecosystem.

    They prevent any species from over grazing the vegetation. This allows for vegetation growth in an area which allows for an increase in biodiversity, since other species call said vegetation their home.

    In the UK deers have overgrazed large parts of Scotland, resulting in a massive decrease in biodiversity, Reintroducing the wolf will bring their numbers under control which will result in an increase in trees and hedges. More species will come and live in these trees, hence biodiversity increases.

    In any case, who are we to say about a native species ‘They cannot live here, they inconvenience us.’ The world doesn’t revolve around our needs. If a species is native to an area, it has much right as humans to live there.

  10. James,

    Thanks for commenting. I’d like to address your last statement first, “If a species is native to an area, it has much right as humans to live there.”

    Are human beings “native” to N. America? Please define what it means to be “native American” very carefully. How about Barred Owls, are they a “native” species to N. America? What about horses or even tumbleweeds? Are these species all “native” to N. America,? (See my article- https://oldmanoftheski.com/2012/12/27/wild-horses-symbol-of-the-american-west-or-an-invasive-species/).

    The term “native” is subjective and arbitrary, and usually refers to a species that was in a particular region first, or before another species. However, there is no scientific basis that says a species must remain in a particular region, or be preserved in a particular region, just because it was present in a particular region or ecosystem before some other species came along. For example, Barred Owls are not considered native to Oregon and Washington State, but have migrated NATURALLY to fill a niche that was available, thus interbreeding with and possibly saving, or replacing (depending on your viewpoint) the “native” Spotted Owl that was previously on the scene. The fact is, species move, migrate, invade new territory, and go extinct, for many reasons, but often because of the pressure from other species.

    Regarding wolves- the presence of wolves drives down ungulate numbers. They do this by depredation and the spread of hundreds of diseases. Wolves reproduce exponentially and can wipe out non-migratory populations of elk, caribou, and moose. The loss of these grazers has serious repercussions on the land. More grazers actually improve range land conditions while fewer grazers can quickly degrade range land, or grass/forage based ecosystems.

    There is much to be said for the statement, “Log it, graze it, or watch it burn”. (See the TED talk on Youtube or find the PDF version of “Cows can save the world” by renowned biologist/environmentalist, Allan Savory.)

  11. James,

    There are many ways to solve a regional ungulate overpopulation problem without importing wolves. Wolves cannot be managed, they must be controlled, which is a difficult task, politically divisive, extremely time consuming, and expensive. The presence of wolves creates all sorts of additional problems, i,e, disease spread and depredation of livestock, pets, and the occasional person. One should also consider the dietary needs and habits of wolves. Wolves reproduce exponentially in the presence of abundant prey. When a preferred prey species becomes exhausted, wolves don’t just lie down and die, but seek alternative prey and alternative territory.

    Is Scotland really ready for all that?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s